Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMéndez Fernández, Ana Belén 
dc.contributor.authorAguiar Fernández, Francisco Javier 
dc.contributor.authorLombardero Posada, Xoan Miguel 
dc.contributor.authorMurcia Álvarez, Evelia 
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Fernández, Antonio 
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-08T06:59:18Z
dc.date.available2022-06-08T06:59:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-19
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Social Work, 52(2): 1089-1109 (2021)spa
dc.identifier.issn00453102
dc.identifier.issn1468263X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11093/3545
dc.descriptionFinanciado para publicación en acceso aberto: Universidade de Vigo/CISUG
dc.description.abstractDue to the indirect exposure to traumatic realities, social workers may experience emotional responses of vicarious traumatisation or vicarious resilience. Previous research indicated that risk factors (workload and trauma caseload) provoke vicarious traumatisation and that protection factors (recovery experiences and organisational support) can buffer this relationship. However, the empirical testing of these associations was scarce amongst social workers. This cross-sectional study aims to answer two main research questions: (i) can workload and trauma caseload predict vicarious resilience and vicarious trauma? (ii) Can recovery experiences and organisational support mediate the influence of risk factors on emotional responses? A sample of 373 Spanish social workers (87 per cent females) completed a questionnaire online. The structural equation modelling analyses showed that workload and trauma caseload make recovery experiences and organisational support less likely, facilitating the emergence of vicarious trauma. Recovery experiences and organisational support protect people from vicarious trauma and promote vicarious resilience, both directly and by limiting the influence of workload and trauma caseload. These results highlight the need for interventions enhancing recovery experiences and organisational support as a means to promote vicarious resilience and to decrease vicarious trauma. The need to reduce other risk factors, enhancing protective factors, is also noted.spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherBritish Journal of Social Workspa
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleVicariously resilient or traumatised social workers: exploring some risk and protective factorsen
dc.typearticlespa
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjsw/bcab085
dc.identifier.editorhttps://academic.oup.com/bjsw/article/52/2/1089/6278015spa
dc.publisher.departamentoAnálise e intervención psicosocioeducativaspa
dc.publisher.grupoinvestigacionTeoría Feministaspa
dc.publisher.grupoinvestigacionEducación, Actividade Física e Saúde. GIES.spa
dc.publisher.grupoinvestigacionSaúde, Sexualidade e Xénerospa
dc.subject.unesco5309.08 Trabajo Social y Servicios Socialesspa
dc.date.updated2022-06-07T11:56:21Z
dc.computerCitationpub_title=British Journal of Social Work|volume=52|journal_number=2|start_pag=1089|end_pag=1109spa


Files in this item

[PDF]

    Show simple item record

    Attribution 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International