Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorManchado, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorTortosa Martínez, Juan
dc.contributor.authorPueo, Basilio
dc.contributor.authorCortell Tormo, Juan Manuel
dc.contributor.authorVila Suárez, María Elena 
dc.contributor.authorFerragut Fiol, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Sánchez, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorBusquier, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorAmat, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorChirosa Ríos, Luis Javier
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T12:22:39Z
dc.date.available2022-05-27T12:22:39Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-17
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18): 6768 (2020)eng
dc.identifier.issn16604601
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11093/3493
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to analyze the on-court demands of handball players during the European Handball Federation Champions League Final Four (VELUX EHF FINAL4) 2019 to define time–motion characteristics (played time; covered distances) both in offense and defense. Furthermore; we aimed to define position-specific demands and differences among them. Forty players from three teams were analyzed during the tournament using a local positioning system (LPS) for the first time in top handball. Players covered similar distances both in offense (1388.28 ± 2627.08 m), and in defense (1305.47 ± 5059.64 m) and remained on court for a similar average time (15.69 ± 8.02 min and 15.40 ± 8.94 min respectively). When locomotion activities were normalized according to the time they spent on court; significant differences were found for defense compared to offense in walking (+20%; p < 0.000; Cohen’s effect size (ES) = 1.01) and jogging (−29.6%; p = 0.000; ES = 0.90), as well as a tendency for high-intensity running (+ 25.2%; p = 0.077; ES = 0.31). Per playing position; center and left back (CB = 94.86 ± 10.98 m·min−1; LB = 96.55 ± 24.65 m·min−1) showed the highest running pace in offense and mid-left; front center defender and outside right for the defense (ML = 90.38 ± 30.16 m·min−1; FCD = 87.04 ± 14.94 m·min−1; OR = 89.64 ± 34.93 m·min−1). In conclusion; profile differences existed among players’ position activity; both in offense and defense; which should be taken into account when designing specific physical training programseng
dc.description.sponsorshipFundación Seneca (Murcia) | Ref. 20928/PI/18spa
dc.description.sponsorshipMINECO/FEDER | Ref. PID2019-108336GB-100spa
dc.description.sponsorshipConsejo Superior de Deportes | Ref. 24/UPB/19spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healtheng
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PID2019-108336GB-100/ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleHigh-performance handball player’s time-motion analysis by playing positionseng
dc.typearticlespa
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph17186768
dc.identifier.editorhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6768spa
dc.publisher.departamentoDidácticas especiaisspa
dc.publisher.grupoinvestigacionHealthyFitspa
dc.subject.unesco2411.06 Fisiología del Ejerciciospa
dc.subject.unesco2411.18 Fisiología del Movimientospa
dc.subject.unesco6109.07 Evaluación del Rendimientospa
dc.date.updated2022-05-27T08:12:30Z
dc.computerCitationpub_title=International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health|volume=17|journal_number=18|start_pag=6768|end_pag=spa


Files in this item

[PDF]

    Show simple item record

    Attribution 4.0 International
    Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International